Sign up Calendar Latest Topics Donate
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 3 of 3      Prev   1   2   3
Walt Strong

Sr. Member
Registered:
Posts: 889
Reply with quote  #31 
"API 670 also gives user the option of having a monitor and display in true peak."

What is API 670 definition of "true peak"?

Similar discussion 2-years ago:
https://www.machineryanalysis.org/post/rms-or-peak-8196694?highlight=rms&trail=15

Walt
John from PA

Sr. Member
Registered:
Posts: 963
Reply with quote  #32 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt Strong

What is API 670 definition of "true peak"?

Walt


A definition per se doesn't exist within API 670.

Quoting from API 670 5th Edition, Annex E, specifically

E.2.5 Several important additional factors shall also be considered:

a)  The detection circuitry in the monitor shall be consistent with the displayed units. If peak is displayed, a peak circuit detector shall be used in the monitor circuitry. Confusion occurs when an rms detector is used in the monitor and its output is scaled by 1.414 to display as peak units. This conversion is only valid for purely sinusoidal signals, which is rarely the situation except during calibration. An instrument displaying peak as 1.414 × rms may yield significantly lower values than one with a true peak detector when observing the same vibration signal.  Many portable instruments use this approach, which can create confusion when comparing readings. To avoid confusion, it is recommended that peak measurements derived from rms be referred to as “derived peak” to distinguish them from “true peak” measurements.

MarkL

Avatar / Picture

Sr. Member
Registered:
Posts: 1,120
Reply with quote  #33 
Never.
Not on my radar for any of the work I do. 
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.